Rose Land Developers Private Limited - Due diligence report

A 360° intelligence report on Rose Land Developers Private Limited: trust score, financial health, credit view, compliance, directors, growt…

1983-03-31 Mumbai, Maharashtra Strike Off Unlisted Active Non-Compliant
Share
View plans
RL Rose Land Developers Private Limited
Full Due-Diligence Report + Documents
  • Unlock all financial figures & 5-year trends
  • Full trust, health & credit-risk scores
  • Director details, charges & MCA documents
₹700 ₹349 50% off New user
Or enjoy up to 50% off with credits View credit packages
Company Credits – Starter
  • One credit unlocks this full due-diligence report
  • Use across any company’s report, anytime
  • Credits valid for 12 months
× ₹700 ₹279 = ₹2,790 60% off
Choose your own credit amount View credit packages

Rose Land Developers Private Limited — 360° Intelligence Report

Generated from MCA filings & public records
31/100
Trust Score
Caution Indicated

Rose Land Developers Private Limited is assessed as Caution Indicated with a Trust Score of 31/100. Rose Land Developers Private Limited is a private limited indian non-government company incorporated in 1983, operating in the Real Estate and Construction sector. Reported revenue has declined across its recent filed years. It reported a loss in its latest filed year. Based on MCA filings and public records, it currently shows a high compliance risk and high financial risk profile.

Report generated on 04 Jul 2026 from the latest processed filings. Rose Land Developers Private Limited snapshot & full profile →

Financial Health › Caution
Overall Assessment CautionWeakNeutralGoodStrong Weak
Compliance › Caution

Automated indicators derived from public MCA / GST / EPFO records - not a credit rating, not investment, legal or financial advice. Spotted an inaccuracy? Report an error.

02

Score Card

Higher is safer · rule-based & explainable
Trust ScoreCaution Indicated
31/100
Overall counterparty trust - the headline number of this report.
Compliance ScoreCaution Indicated
5/100
Statutory standing - status, filings, auditor, MSME and litigation.
Financial Health ScoreCaution Indicated
20/100
Profitability, leverage and liquidity from filed statements.
Credit Risk ScoreCaution Indicated
45/100
Debt capacity, gearing and security cover for lenders.
Director Stability ScoreModerate
55/100
Board strength, DIN status, churn and network.
Growth ScoreCaution Indicated
40/100
Revenue, profit, asset and hiring momentum.
Distress ScoreCaution Indicated
20/100
Early-warning signals - higher means fewer warnings.
03

Financial Intelligence Dashboard

Standalone · 4 filed year(s)

Unlock the full 5-year financial dashboard with charts and year-wise figures.

Get full access

Scores and observations on this page are already computed from the real filings - only the underlying figures are locked.

04

Credit & Compliance Intelligence

Why the scores are what they are
Credit Risk Score: 45/100 Caution Indicated
  • Negative operating earnings - debt service depends on external support.
  • No open charges - unencumbered balance sheet.

Charges position: 0 open (-) · 0 satisfied (-).

Compliance Score: 5/100 Caution Indicated
  • Company status is "Strike Off" - not Active.
  • Marked ACTIVE non-compliant (INC-22A).
  • Last balance sheet is for Mar 2017 - filings overdue.
  • Litigation present in 1 court forum(s).
Legal cases on record (1)
05

Director Intelligence

Stability score: 55/100
NameDIN / PANDesignationAppointedTenureDIN status
DIPAL PRAFUL ROKADIA 01234567 Director 01/04/2018 6 yrs Approved
KAUSHIKA PRAFUL ROKADIA 01234567 Director 01/04/2018 6 yrs Approved
  • 2 directors on the board.
  • DIPAL PRAFUL ROKADIA has DIN status "Deactivated due to non-filing of DIR-3 KYC".
  • Stable board - no exits in 3 years.
  • Average tenure above 5 years.
06

Ownership & Group Intelligence

As per FY 2017 annual return
Promoter holding
64.27%
Public / other holding
35.73%
Equity shares
12,45,67,890
Equity paid-up
124.5 cr
Promoters on record
4
Ultimate holding entity
-
Subsidiaries
-
Group entities
-
Capital events
-

Promoters hold a dominant controlling stake - exact percentages are part of the full report.

Full shareholding pattern, group structure & capital events →

07

Risk Intelligence Center

Growth 40 · Distress 20
Growth signals & trust indicators
Operating for 43+ years.
Distress signals & risk flags
Losses deepening year-on-year.
Negative net worth.
Statutory filings appear overdue.
Adverse company status: Strike Off.
Compliance score is weak (5/100).
1 court case(s) on record - see the legal section for details.
08

Stakeholder Verdicts

Vendor · Banker · Investor
Vendor due diligence17/100
Caution indicated
Suitability as a supplier / customer counterparty.
  • Check the compliance flags before onboarding.
  • 4 distress signal(s) - see Risk Center.
  • Financial filings available for verification.
Banker assessment28/100
Enhanced diligence advised
Indicative lending comfort for banks, NBFCs and trade credit.
  • Debt capacity assessed from filed statements.
  • No existing security registered - first-charge position available.
  • Compliance gaps should be priced into terms.
Investor view31/100
Limited indicators at present
Growth quality and scalability through an investor lens.
  • No clear growth signals in the filed years.
  • Margin and return trends computable from filings.
  • Management churn warrants questions.
09

MCA Filings & Events Timeline

Latest 7 events
30 Sep 2017
Last AGM held
Annual general meeting
31 Mar 2017
Latest balance sheet
Filed with ROC
31 Jul 2011
Director ceased
GANESHPRASAD SINGH
30 Nov 2010
Director appointed
DIPAL PRAFUL ROKADIA (Director)
12 Oct 2010
Director ceased
PRAFUL KANTILAL ROKADIA
07 Aug 1989
Director appointed
KAUSHIKA PRAFUL ROKADIA (Director)
31 Mar 1983
Incorporated
Registered with Roc Mumbai
10

Key Observations

Auto-generated from the data above
Revenue declined 38% over the last 3 financial year(s).
2 active director(s) / partner(s); review board churn before relying on management continuity.
Promoters hold a dominant controlling stake as per the FY 2017 annual return.
11

Peers & Related Companies

Full peer comparison →
CompanyCINLocation
Alethea Infradevelopers Private Limited U70100DL2011PTC220844 New Delhi, Delhi, India
Chirag Promoters And Developers Private Limited U45201DL2006PTC147305 New Delhi-65, Delhi, India
Libera Developers Private Limited U45201MH2007PTC173480 Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Beautiful Vypaar Pvt Ltd U51109WB2006PTC109850 Kolkata, West Bengal, India
City Corporation (Goa) Developers Private Limited U70102PN2007PTC130536 Pune, Maharashtra, India
K.M. Group U70101DL2011PTC219476 Delhi, Delhi, India
Shri Gagangiri Ifra Projects Private Limited U45200MH2003PTC140260 New Panvel, Maharashtra, India
Flexible Housing Needs Private Limited U45200DL2010PTC204580 Delhi, Delhi, India
12

Who Uses This Report

CA · CS · Banker · Investor · Vendor
Chartered Accountants (CA)

Verify Rose Land Developers Private Limited before audits and certifications: compliance score 5/100, filing history, auditor history and charge records in one place - instead of pulling each MCA form separately.

Company Secretaries (CS)

Track statutory health of Rose Land Developers Private Limited: ACTIVE compliance status, annual-return recency, director DIN status, board churn and the events timeline - the inputs for secretarial audits and due-diligence certificates.

Bankers & NBFCs

Current banker verdict: Enhanced diligence advised. Credit risk score 45/100, existing charge position and lender relationships - a first-pass credit memo before formal appraisal.

Investors & Analysts

Investor view: Limited indicators at present. Growth score 40/100, margin trends, ownership structure and peer set for Rose Land Developers Private Limited - screening before a deeper diligence.

Vendors & Procurement Teams

Vendor verdict: Caution indicated. Trust score 31/100, distress signals and MSME payment-delay disclosures - know whether Rose Land Developers Private Limited pays its suppliers before you extend credit terms.

Lawyers & Compliance Teams

Litigation footprint (1 case(s) on record), regulatory flags, charge documents trail and director networks for Rose Land Developers Private Limited - groundwork for KYC, onboarding and disputes.

13

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rose Land Developers Private Limited an active company?

Rose Land Developers Private Limited has MCA status “Strike Off” with a compliance score of 5/100 (Caution Indicated).

Is Rose Land Developers Private Limited financially healthy?

Rose Land Developers Private Limited has a Financial Health Score of 20/100 (Caution Indicated) based on its filed financial statements.

Should I do business with Rose Land Developers Private Limited?

Its overall Trust Score is 31/100 (Caution Indicated). Vendor verdict: Caution indicated. Review the risk flags in the Risk Intelligence Center before deciding.

Who controls Rose Land Developers Private Limited?

Promoters hold a dominant controlling stake - exact percentages are in the full report. 2 active director(s) are on record.

Does Rose Land Developers Private Limited have loans or charges against its assets?

No charges are registered against this company - an unencumbered balance sheet.

Is Rose Land Developers Private Limited up to date with its ROC filings?

Marked ACTIVE non-compliant (INC-22A). Overall compliance score: 5/100 (Caution Indicated).

Is it risky to lend to Rose Land Developers Private Limited?

Its Credit Risk Score is 45/100 (Caution Indicated). Banker verdict: Enhanced diligence advised.

Disclaimer: This report is generated automatically from MCA filings and public records as available in our system at the time of the last update. Scores, bands and verdicts are rule-based derived indicators of the underlying data - they are opinions generated by an algorithm, not statements of fact about the company, and are not credit ratings (within the meaning of SEBI regulations), audits, or investment, legal or financial advice. Verify from official sources and consult a qualified professional before any business, lending or investment decision. If you represent this company and believe any information is inaccurate or outdated, report it here and we will review promptly.