Cihhm Foundation - Due diligence report
A 360° intelligence report on Cihhm Foundation: trust score, financial health, credit view, compliance, directors, growth and distress signa…
- Unlock all financial figures & 5-year trends
- Full trust, health & credit-risk scores
- Director details, charges & MCA documents
- One credit unlocks this full due-diligence report
- Use across any company’s report, anytime
- Credits valid for 12 months
Cihhm Foundation — 360° Intelligence Report
Generated from MCA filings & public recordsCihhm Foundation is assessed as Low Risk with a Trust Score of 86/100. Cihhm Foundation is an active private not for profit company incorporated in 2020, operating in the Education sector. The company has shown revenue growth across its recent filed years. It was profitable in its latest filed year. Based on MCA filings and public records, it currently shows a low compliance risk and low financial risk profile.
Report generated on 03 Jul 2026 from the latest processed filings. Cihhm Foundation snapshot & full profile →
Automated indicators derived from public MCA / GST / EPFO records - not a credit rating, not investment, legal or financial advice. Spotted an inaccuracy? Report an error.
Score Card
Higher is safer · rule-based & explainableFinancial Intelligence Dashboard
Standalone · 3 filed year(s)Unlock the full 5-year financial dashboard with charts and year-wise figures.
Get full accessScores and observations on this page are already computed from the real filings - only the underlying figures are locked.
Credit & Compliance Intelligence
Why the scores are what they are- Liabilities ≈ 38% EBITDA - stretched.
- No open charges - unencumbered balance sheet.
- Elevated gearing (D/E 1.42).
- Profitable - internal accruals available.
Charges position: 0 open (-) · 0 satisfied (-).
- Company status is Active as per MCA.
- Annual filings current (balance sheet Mar 2025).
Director Intelligence
Stability score: 85/100| Name | DIN / PAN | Designation | Appointed | Tenure | DIN status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anupam Jana | 01234567 | Director | 01/04/2018 | 6 yrs | Approved |
| Swapna Jana | 01234567 | Director | 01/04/2018 | 6 yrs | Approved |
- 2 directors on the board.
- No disqualified or deactivated DINs.
- 2 director exit(s) in the last 3 years.
Ownership & Group Intelligence
As per FY 2023 annual returnPromoters hold a dominant controlling stake - exact percentages are part of the full report.
Full shareholding pattern, group structure & capital events →
Risk Intelligence Center
Growth 85 · Distress 80Stakeholder Verdicts
Vendor · Banker · Investor- Statutory record is clean.
- 1 distress signal(s) - see Risk Center.
- Financial filings available for verification.
- Debt capacity assessed from filed statements.
- No existing security registered - first-charge position available.
- Compliance record supports lending.
- 3 growth signal(s) detected.
- Margin and return trends computable from filings.
- Management team looks stable.
MCA Filings & Events Timeline
Latest 7 eventsKey Observations
Auto-generated from the data above| Company | CIN | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Kab Educational Services Private Limited | U80904TG2012PTC081994 | Hyderabad, Telangana, India |
| Pradeep Richa Educare Foundation | U80301DL2010NPL210926 | New Delhi, Delhi, India |
| Naga Education Private Limited | U80904NL2020PTC013550 | Kohima, Nagaland, India |
| Nabhahita Technologies Private Limited | U72900KA2018PTC110835 | Bangalore South, Karnataka, India |
| Inspera Education And Healthcare Private Limited | U80301TN2018PTC124863 | Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India |
| Educadd Learning Solutions | U80903KA2011PTC061382 | Bangalore, Karnataka, India |
| Setrap Education Services Private Limited | U80903DL2019PTC343939 | New Delhi, Delhi, India |
| Skills Reform Private Limited | U80903DL2020PTC367843 | Newdelhi, Delhi, India |
Who Uses This Report
CA · CS · Banker · Investor · VendorVerify Cihhm Foundation before audits and certifications: compliance score 100/100, filing history, auditor history and charge records in one place - instead of pulling each MCA form separately.
Track statutory health of Cihhm Foundation: ACTIVE compliance status, annual-return recency, director DIN status, board churn and the events timeline - the inputs for secretarial audits and due-diligence certificates.
Current banker verdict: Mixed indicators - deeper appraisal suggested. Credit risk score 45/100, existing charge position and lender relationships - a first-pass credit memo before formal appraisal.
Investor view: Positive growth indicators. Growth score 85/100, margin trends, ownership structure and peer set for Cihhm Foundation - screening before a deeper diligence.
Vendor verdict: Favourable indicators. Trust score 86/100, distress signals and MSME payment-delay disclosures - know whether Cihhm Foundation pays its suppliers before you extend credit terms.
Litigation footprint (no cases on record), regulatory flags, charge documents trail and director networks for Cihhm Foundation - groundwork for KYC, onboarding and disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cihhm Foundation an active company?
Cihhm Foundation has MCA status “Active” with a compliance score of 100/100 (Low Risk).
Is Cihhm Foundation financially healthy?
Cihhm Foundation has a Financial Health Score of 75/100 (Low Risk) based on its filed financial statements.
Should I do business with Cihhm Foundation?
Its overall Trust Score is 86/100 (Low Risk). Vendor verdict: Favourable indicators. Review the risk flags in the Risk Intelligence Center before deciding.
Who controls Cihhm Foundation?
Promoters hold a dominant controlling stake - exact percentages are in the full report. 2 active director(s) are on record.
Does Cihhm Foundation have loans or charges against its assets?
No charges are registered against this company - an unencumbered balance sheet.
Is Cihhm Foundation up to date with its ROC filings?
Annual filings current (balance sheet Mar 2025). Overall compliance score: 100/100 (Low Risk).
Is it risky to lend to Cihhm Foundation?
Its Credit Risk Score is 45/100 (Caution Indicated). Banker verdict: Mixed indicators - deeper appraisal suggested.