Care For All Foundation - Due diligence report
A 360° intelligence report on Care For All Foundation: trust score, financial health, credit view, compliance, directors, growth and distres…
- Unlock all financial figures & 5-year trends
- Full trust, health & credit-risk scores
- Director details, charges & MCA documents
- One credit unlocks this full due-diligence report
- Use across any company’s report, anytime
- Credits valid for 12 months
Care For All Foundation — 360° Intelligence Report
Generated from MCA filings & public recordsCare For All Foundation is assessed as Low Risk with a Trust Score of 78/100. Care For All Foundation is an active private not for profit company incorporated in 2017, operating in the Healthcare sector. The company has shown revenue growth across its recent filed years. It was profitable in its latest filed year. Based on MCA filings and public records, it currently shows a low compliance risk and moderate financial risk profile.
Report generated on 17 Jul 2026 from the latest processed filings. Care For All Foundation snapshot & full profile →
Automated indicators derived from public MCA / GST / EPFO records - not a credit rating, not investment, legal or financial advice. Spotted an inaccuracy? Report an error.
Score Card
Higher is safer · rule-based & explainableFinancial Intelligence Dashboard
Standalone · 4 filed year(s)Unlock the full 5-year financial dashboard with charts and year-wise figures.
Get full accessScores and observations on this page are already computed from the real filings - only the underlying figures are locked.
Credit & Compliance Intelligence
Why the scores are what they are- Liabilities ≈ 38% EBITDA - stretched.
- No open charges - unencumbered balance sheet.
- Profitable - internal accruals available.
Charges position: 0 open (-) · 0 satisfied (-).
- Company status is Active as per MCA.
- Annual filings current (balance sheet Mar 2025).
Director Intelligence
Stability score: 90/100| Name | DIN / PAN | Designation | Appointed | Tenure | DIN status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHAGWAT PRSHAD SHARMA | 01234567 | Director | 01/04/2018 | 6 yrs | Approved |
| NEERAJ KUMAR SHARMA | 01234567 | Director | 01/04/2018 | 6 yrs | Approved |
- 2 directors on the board.
- No disqualified or deactivated DINs.
- 1 director exit(s) in the last 3 years.
- Average tenure above 5 years.
Ownership & Group Intelligence
Full shareholding pattern, group structure & capital events →
Risk Intelligence Center
Growth 85 · Distress 70Stakeholder Verdicts
Vendor · Banker · Investor- Statutory record is clean.
- 1 distress signal(s) - see Risk Center.
- Financial filings available for verification.
- Debt capacity assessed from filed statements.
- No existing security registered - first-charge position available.
- Compliance record supports lending.
- 3 growth signal(s) detected.
- Margin and return trends computable from filings.
- Management team looks stable.
MCA Filings & Events Timeline
Latest 6 eventsKey Observations
Auto-generated from the data above| Company | CIN | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Sooryam Medi And Healthcare Private Limited | U85100DL2021PTC383139 | Delhi, Delhi, India |
| Buddhi Healthcare Private Limited | U85100DL2020PTC372339 | Delhi, Delhi, India |
| Pro Home Care Private Limited | U85100PB2020PTC052493 | Zirakpur, Punjab, India |
| Ugenesis Health Science Private Limited | U85190MH2021PTC353372 | Amravati, Maharashtra, India |
| Tribhuban Samaj Foundation | U85100OR2020NPL032645 | Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India |
| Santkrapa Healthcare Private Limited | U85110UP2021PTC142279 | Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India |
| Ysm Institute Of Yoga And Research Foundation | U85100MH2019NPL320046 | Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India |
| Million Hearts Foundation | U85199DL2018NPL330265 | New Delhi, Delhi, India |
Who Uses This Report
CA · CS · Banker · Investor · VendorVerify Care For All Foundation before audits and certifications: compliance score 100/100, filing history, auditor history and charge records in one place - instead of pulling each MCA form separately.
Track statutory health of Care For All Foundation: ACTIVE compliance status, annual-return recency, director DIN status, board churn and the events timeline - the inputs for secretarial audits and due-diligence certificates.
Current banker verdict: Mixed indicators - deeper appraisal suggested. Credit risk score 55/100, existing charge position and lender relationships - a first-pass credit memo before formal appraisal.
Investor view: Positive growth indicators. Growth score 85/100, margin trends, ownership structure and peer set for Care For All Foundation - screening before a deeper diligence.
Vendor verdict: Favourable indicators. Trust score 78/100, distress signals and MSME payment-delay disclosures - know whether Care For All Foundation pays its suppliers before you extend credit terms.
Litigation footprint (no cases on record), regulatory flags, charge documents trail and director networks for Care For All Foundation - groundwork for KYC, onboarding and disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Care For All Foundation an active company?
Care For All Foundation has MCA status “Active” with a compliance score of 100/100 (Low Risk).
Is Care For All Foundation financially healthy?
Care For All Foundation has a Financial Health Score of 50/100 (Moderate) based on its filed financial statements.
Should I do business with Care For All Foundation?
Its overall Trust Score is 78/100 (Low Risk). Vendor verdict: Favourable indicators. Review the risk flags in the Risk Intelligence Center before deciding.
Who controls Care For All Foundation?
See the directors and ownership sections above for board and shareholding detail. 2 active director(s) are on record.
Does Care For All Foundation have loans or charges against its assets?
No charges are registered against this company - an unencumbered balance sheet.
Is Care For All Foundation up to date with its ROC filings?
Annual filings current (balance sheet Mar 2025). Overall compliance score: 100/100 (Low Risk).
Is it risky to lend to Care For All Foundation?
Its Credit Risk Score is 55/100 (Moderate). Banker verdict: Mixed indicators - deeper appraisal suggested.