Applied Mobile Labs Private Limited - Due diligence report
A 360° intelligence report on Amlpl: trust score, financial health, credit view, compliance, directors, growth and distress signals - genera…
- Unlock all financial figures & 5-year trends
- Full trust, health & credit-risk scores
- Director details, charges & MCA documents
- One credit unlocks this full due-diligence report
- Use across any company’s report, anytime
- Credits valid for 12 months
Amlpl — 360° Intelligence Report
Generated from MCA filings & public recordsAmlpl is assessed as Moderate with a Trust Score of 57/100. Amlpl is an active private limited indian non-government company incorporated in 2009, operating in the Information Technology sector. Reported revenue has declined across its recent filed years. It reported a loss in its latest filed year. Based on MCA filings and public records, it currently shows a high compliance risk and moderate financial risk profile.
Report generated on 08 Jul 2026 from the latest processed filings. Applied Mobile Labs Private Limited snapshot & full profile →
Automated indicators derived from public MCA / GST / EPFO records - not a credit rating, not investment, legal or financial advice. Spotted an inaccuracy? Report an error.
Score Card
Higher is safer · rule-based & explainableFinancial Intelligence Dashboard
Standalone · 2 filed year(s)Unlock the full 5-year financial dashboard with charts and year-wise figures.
Get full accessScores and observations on this page are already computed from the real filings - only the underlying figures are locked.
Credit & Compliance Intelligence
Why the scores are what they are- Negative operating earnings - debt service depends on external support.
- Moderate gearing (D/E 38%).
- Working-capital cover adequate.
Charges position: 1 open (1.00 cr) · 0 satisfied (-).
| Lender | Charges | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Canbank Factors Limited | 1 | 48.0 cr |
- Company status is Active as per MCA.
- Marked ACTIVE non-compliant (INC-22A).
- Last balance sheet is for Mar 2015 - filings overdue.
- Litigation present in 1 court forum(s).
Director Intelligence
Stability score: 55/100| Name | DIN / PAN | Designation | Appointed | Tenure | DIN status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRINCE KUMAR | 01234567 | Director | 01/04/2018 | 6 yrs | Approved |
| UMESH KUMAR BAVEJA | 01234567 | Director | 01/04/2018 | 6 yrs | Approved |
- 2 directors on the board.
- UMESH KUMAR BAVEJA has DIN status "Disqualified by RoC u/s 164(2)".
- Stable board - no exits in 3 years.
- Average tenure above 5 years.
Ownership & Group Intelligence
As per FY 2015 annual returnPromoters hold a majority stake - exact percentages are part of the full report.
Full shareholding pattern, group structure & capital events →
Risk Intelligence Center
Growth 40 · Distress 50Stakeholder Verdicts
Vendor · Banker · Investor- Check the compliance flags before onboarding.
- 3 distress signal(s) - see Risk Center.
- Financial filings available for verification.
- Debt capacity assessed from filed statements.
- 1 open charge(s) of 1.00 cr already registered.
- Compliance gaps should be priced into terms.
- No clear growth signals in the filed years.
- Margin and return trends computable from filings.
- Management churn warrants questions.
MCA Filings & Events Timeline
Latest 15 eventsKey Observations
Auto-generated from the data above| Company | CIN | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Umak Resource Communications Private Limited | U93090TN1998PTC040232 | Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India |
| Emkor Solutions Limited | U74140DL2012PLC229812 | New Delhi, Delhi, India |
| Rainconcert | U72200KL2008PTC022270 | Trivandrum, Kerala, India |
| Dna Smartlink Broadband Private Limited | U64120MH2012PTC237705 | Mumbai, Maharashtra, India |
| Getit Infoservices | U22200DL2013PTC248760 | New Delhi, Delhi, India |
| Imec India Private Limited | U73100KA2011FTC072614 | Bangalore, Karnataka, India |
| Dsouza Technology Solutions Private Limited | U74999GA2010PTC006434 | St Cruz, Goa, India |
| Innova Am Tech Private Limited | U72200DL2012PTC242640 | New Delhi, Delhi, India |
Who Uses This Report
CA · CS · Banker · Investor · VendorVerify Amlpl before audits and certifications: compliance score 48/100, filing history, auditor history and charge records in one place - instead of pulling each MCA form separately.
Track statutory health of Amlpl: ACTIVE compliance status, annual-return recency, director DIN status, board churn and the events timeline - the inputs for secretarial audits and due-diligence certificates.
Current banker verdict: Mixed indicators - deeper appraisal suggested. Credit risk score 55/100, existing charge position and lender relationships - a first-pass credit memo before formal appraisal.
Investor view: Mixed indicators. Growth score 40/100, margin trends, ownership structure and peer set for Amlpl - screening before a deeper diligence.
Vendor verdict: Review suggested. Trust score 57/100, distress signals and MSME payment-delay disclosures - know whether Amlpl pays its suppliers before you extend credit terms.
Litigation footprint (1 case(s) on record), regulatory flags, charge documents trail and director networks for Amlpl - groundwork for KYC, onboarding and disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Amlpl an active company?
Amlpl has MCA status “Active” with a compliance score of 48/100 (Caution Indicated).
Is Amlpl financially healthy?
Amlpl has a Financial Health Score of 50/100 (Moderate) based on its filed financial statements.
Should I do business with Amlpl?
Its overall Trust Score is 57/100 (Moderate). Vendor verdict: Review suggested. Review the risk flags in the Risk Intelligence Center before deciding.
Who controls Amlpl?
Promoters hold a majority stake - exact percentages are in the full report. 2 active director(s) are on record.
Does Amlpl have loans or charges against its assets?
1 open charge(s) are registered against its assets.
Is Amlpl up to date with its ROC filings?
Marked ACTIVE non-compliant (INC-22A). Overall compliance score: 48/100 (Caution Indicated).
Is it risky to lend to Amlpl?
Its Credit Risk Score is 55/100 (Moderate). Banker verdict: Mixed indicators - deeper appraisal suggested.